• Welcome to The Forum for Gauge 3 Model Trains.
 
The Gauge 3 Society       2.1/2 inch Gauge Association       Cookies and privacy HOW TO JOIN: to request forum membership please click here

Gauge 3 Society members must be logged in to view the Society section
  G3 Clubroom

Welcome to the G3 Clubroom. This is the friendly online forum where members share ideas and inspiration, suggestions and advice, modelling tips, pictures and drawings, and general chat about our fine hobby of Gauge 3 railway modelling. A warm welcome, and enjoy your visit here today.

Flexikit - Third Generation .... have your say!

Started by John Candy, Dec 29 2013 19:56

« previous - next »

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Geoff Nicholls

John,
If you're thinking of producing an all steel open wagon using the flexikit technique, how thick is the body? Can you cast it that thin? when I finish my 08 shunter in EWS livery, I'll need some wagons for it, they're all steel, e.g.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jmupton2000/7027842113/
Geoff.

John Candy

Geoff,

2mm is about the thinnest possible for a long side and I would normally recommend reinforcing that with a fitted "load" to prevent bowing when squeezed!

The link you gave shows a wagon with substantial outside square steel framing, so that would not require internal bracing and the thickness of the plating would be disguised by the top edge framing.

I don't know (almost dread to think) what Mike will have to say about producing such a wagon!

My idea of a "modern" wagon is the Felix Pole GWR all steel 20 tonners!

Regards,
John.
My fellow Members, ask not what your Society can do for you, ask what you can do for your Society.

MikeWilliams

I agree with John that the substantial framing should make that possible in resin, and the low height of the side doesn't leave a large thin piece susceptible to warping either.  Biggest problem I can see is the large number of patterns required for castings.  Axleguards, buffers (couplings?), brakes .. absolutely everything is new.  And, with a wheelbase that long I believe that springing or compensation are not just desirable but necessary.

In short, a lot of work but no serious technical problems.

Mike

Geoff Nicholls

Thank you both for the quick response. I'll work to that 2mm thickness when I produce my first wagon. And point taken about suspension. A lot of these steel box wagons are new bodies on the underframes of earlier obsolete BR wagons, if I choose the prototype carefully I might have two wagons for the work of three halves.
I'll probably ask the DEMU types, who I know have done some casting themselves, as they know the real thing,  but if they baulk at something that large,  I may need to ask if you could do it as a commission.
Geoff.

Andy B

MHA's were converted from the HAA MGR coal hoppers.
The conversion is too recent, but a quick search has identified some HAA drawings - if they're of any use for the grubby bits below solebar level!
So far, GA, Underframe arrangement and body arrangement - so a reasonable chance of finding some details too.

Andy

Geoff Nicholls

Andy,
GA drawings of the HAA would be an excellent start. They themselves seem to still be around as well.
so, yes, please

John, Mike,
sorry I've co-opted your thread, for my own purposes.
Geoff.