• Welcome to The Forum for Gauge 3 Model Trains.
 
The Gauge 3 Society       2.1/2 inch Gauge Association       Cookies and privacy HOW TO JOIN: to request forum membership please click here

Gauge 3 Society members must be logged in to view the Society section
  G3 Clubroom

Welcome to the G3 Clubroom. This is the friendly online forum where members share ideas and inspiration, suggestions and advice, modelling tips, pictures and drawings, and general chat about our fine hobby of Gauge 3 railway modelling. A warm welcome, and enjoy your visit here today.

Loco springing.

Started by Geoff Nicholls, Jan 26 2015 10:50

« previous - next »

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Geoff Nicholls

I had a chance to inspect the Kingscale Britannia underframe at the London Model Engineering show. The stallholder said his engineer choose to use strong springs so the loco sat at its maximum height. that way the loco didn't rock and roll as it ran along. He demonstrated this by pressing down with his hands. It seemed to drop a good 2mm or more.
On my loco I did the opposite, the weight of the loco 'bottoms out' the springs, whose chief purpose seems to be to press the axle down to accommodate depressions in the track (the centre axle has vertical play upwards.
has anyone compared these methods and one preferable?
Geoff.

454

Geoff

My Kingscale Brit has a proven track record of running on garden railways throughout the country. It's history is documented elsewhere on this forum. Whatever the springing mechanism performance, it is my opinion that Kingscale (& presumably Mike Pave) got it right. My loco runs & performs accordingly. Cannot fault it. As a consequence makes sense to copy success rather than go against this principle. But there again, there is so much theory swishing around & everybody has their own ideas I tend not to be surprised when other folks include their own quirks into established designs.

Dave
454